Hello

Hello NSA,

how you doing? No i'm not gonna go allahuakbar or durka durka muhammad jihad and bomb your country. But could you please stop your government from claiming you guys are "free"

Ciao

Corruption?

Recently there has been a documentary about how the current chief minister of Sarawak is basically selling the natural resources of the state to the highest bidder while lining his pockets. The question is why the fuck do the westerners care so much about the corruption here?

The Sarawakians aren't dumb they know that the current Chief Minister is a massive douche, the thing is what does exposing the corruption help, Logging is still going to happen regardless of whether or not  the "white hair" is in power. Furthermore what right to these outsiders have to criticize us when they haven't the balls to criticize their own governments. Look at the United States, if they really wanted to do something positive for indigenous communities then why don't they give back all the land stolen from the Native Americans.

Corruption is Human Nature, regardless of what all the idealists say no one is free from corruption, So instead of making documentaries highlighting the negative  political aspects of a country you have no business being involved in, how's about you focus on making documentaries of people trying to make the nation a better place or even better get of their arses and come to the streets of KL when the sun goes down and volunteer yourselves.

Ciao,
Me

Voting?

The concept of voting in this nation makes me laugh to my core, Everyone seems to think that hey the governments really bad that's why we should go and vote for the opposition and counter the votes of the illegal immigrants. But really are you people truly voting for a better country or are you voting because you want to give another corrupt regime the chances of making their already fat wallets overflow.

People ask me why I am not going back to vote, and I always reply "No, what benefit does it give me knowing that regardless of what happens whether one party wins or the other party wins, the only one's who benefit are the politicians who get into power?" Then people choose to disregard me because since I am not voting I have no right to criticize the government right?.. Wrong, regardless of whether I vote or not I still have a right to criticize what the "power" holders do. I pay taxes in that i pay taxes on the things I consume in my daily life, this gives me a stake in what I want to see the government truly focus on.

I love my country, but if I was ever going to vote it would be to vote for myself.

For more on my opinions leave me a buzz at
http://www.facebook.com/AKU.KAMU.DEPA

Ciao,
Your Friendly Neighbourhood Psyduck.

Politics?

Just a few days ago a prominent politician came to Sarawak and participated in a talk just outside the campus of my university. Why that area? The answer is that it is a very student populated area, again cheap theatrics for politicians to garner votes. All so they can come into government and line their pockets. It makes me sick how influenced youths can get these days. Politics is the second oldest profession in the world the first being prostitution. it shows how morally abhorrent politics really is. politicians are second to prostitutes and most politicians really are prostitutes, because they sell themselves to the people with money aka the corporations or other states.

In my opinion  the only true form of perfect governance is a form of idealist socialism in which adhering to the true essence of Marxism there would be no government but rather a system where everyone monitors each other's professional lives and their private lives are regulated by the individuals themselves unless it violates the UN charter of Human rights. Which is why I support the Idea of Voter Apathy. Why vote for a government who lines their pockets whilst their are people suffering on the streets. Yes I agree the government has done a lot for the people, maintaining the various subsidies and providing resources for the people however if these politicians contributed at least 25% of their salary and money they receive from their "business" deals to progressing the State, I would be less inclined to be apathetic to politics however I doubt it will ever change because Human Nature is just so fucked up.

Veritas est Quaestio

Sincerely,
Me

Really?

I find it ridiculously annoying and irritating the amount of religious mumbo jumbo posted by my "friends" on facebook. Firstly i support that you are entitled to your beliefs but come on guys don't shove it in peoples faces...If you want to write all your religious dribble please get a blog so at least then you are not giving people like me an eyesore.

cheers,
Me

Why?

Why do we allow religion to dictate our lives and our state?

The recent attack on Gaza and the response has shown me religion is just a tool used by bureaucrats in bowler hats to inflame the masses. Looking back at this issue of Israel-Palestine both states are in the wrong and this conflict is further enhanced by the growing "Islamisation" of the middle eastern region. The quotation marks on the word i use above serves the simple purpose of showing how the bureaucrats use peoples fears and beliefs to control them, the fear of not being a good muslim or even the fear of deviating from the norms of that state, this is what allows these regimes to control the will, beliefs and movement of its people.

This we can see in this "dear" country of mine if i may be so bold. which claims to be a country that allows the freedom to profess any religion so long as you don't propagate to a muslim. Now the question here is why not propagate to a muslim? if that muslim is so staunch in his faith how can he be led astray, furthermore doesn't this allow for much healthier discourse between faiths?, doesn't this also allow for the expansion of ideas? Look at Al-Andalus in it's prime where everyone lived peacefully and this discourse of knowledge was so vast that it encouraged the construction of the worlds most beautiful library in Cordova. 

Again the idea of non-propagation to muslims is not only harmful but also extremely hypocritical. Why you may ask? because in my lifetime i have never heard prayers blasted over a loudspeaker by a christian preacher, or a hindu priest or even a buddhist monk, but yet all mosques use these loudspeakers not only for the call to prayer but to also preach especially in University hostels, which although consist of majority muslims still has a sizeable non-muslim community. Is this not "forceful" propagation of islam? I am all for preachers giving their sermons in mosques but when they preach over a loudspeaker to the general populace i believe this is a forceful propagation of ideas.

Islam is a religion of peace and acceptance but today we can only be known as extremists or Jihadists.

To whoever reads this, this is my own personal view and I am entitled to it as are you entitled to yours, if i have said something disagreeable then comment and we can have healthy discourse.

Ciao.

Justice?

The idea of justice on an international level is a very biased idea, in the sense that the only crimes that are investigated are the crimes of individuals in middle eastern, African and Asian countries and very few western countries. Why? because no matter how much the UN claims to be unbiased they are still subservient to America due to their status as a "superpower" but really what merits them this status? the only thing they have is guns and obesity, the only time they contribute to "humanitarian" aid is when it can bring positive effects to them a.k.a control of oil reserves.

So why don't we have a International Criminal Court that is truly international in the sense that all countries superpowers included must adhere to the Rome statute and criminals from countries such as America, Great Britain. Germany and such are also tried at this level. won't this situation show the essence of true and unbiased international Law

Heshalom aleichem.
Death.